Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:32:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:32:33 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:20114 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:32:32 -0500 Subject: Re: Proposal: Eliminate GFP_DMA From: Alan Cox To: D.A.Fedorov@inp.nsk.su Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1046454339.17694.8.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 28 Feb 2003 17:45:40 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 700 Lines: 15 On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 15:44, Dmitry A. Fedorov wrote: > But why drivers of ISA bus devices with DMA should use pci_* functions? > > I'm personally wouldn't have too much pain with GFP_DMA because I have > compatibility headers and proposed change for them is tiny. ISA devices or ISA like devices on non x86-32 platforms already need to do this to work on non PC boxes. I'm hoping the generic DMA framework stuff will make that all much cleaner for 2.7 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/