Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753147AbbKWC00 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Nov 2015 21:26:26 -0500 Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com ([209.85.213.170]:36572 "EHLO mail-ig0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752991AbbKWC0Z (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Nov 2015 21:26:25 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56520A9C.2030502@lightnvm.io> References: <1448200278-10272-1-git-send-email-ww.tao0320@gmail.com> <56520A9C.2030502@lightnvm.io> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:26:24 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] lightnvm: calculate device values correctly From: Wenwei Tao To: Matias Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2770 Lines: 61 OK, I see. Thanks for the explanation. 2015-11-23 2:34 GMT+08:00 Matias : > On 11/22/2015 02:51 PM, Wenwei Tao wrote: >> >> In the original calculation, the relationships among >> block, plane and lun was confusing, refine it on the >> basis of Open-channelSSDInterfaceSpecification. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wenwei Tao >> --- >> drivers/lightnvm/core.c | 9 ++++----- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/core.c b/drivers/lightnvm/core.c >> index f659e60..1864b94 100644 >> --- a/drivers/lightnvm/core.c >> +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/core.c >> @@ -174,8 +174,8 @@ static int nvm_core_init(struct nvm_dev *dev) >> dev->nr_chnls = grp->num_ch; >> dev->luns_per_chnl = grp->num_lun; >> dev->pgs_per_blk = grp->num_pg; >> - dev->blks_per_lun = grp->num_blk; >> dev->nr_planes = grp->num_pln; >> + dev->blks_per_lun = grp->num_blk * grp->num_pln; >> dev->sec_size = grp->csecs; >> dev->oob_size = grp->sos; >> dev->sec_per_pg = grp->fpg_sz / grp->csecs; >> @@ -191,13 +191,12 @@ static int nvm_core_init(struct nvm_dev *dev) >> dev->plane_mode = NVM_PLANE_QUAD; >> >> /* calculated values */ >> - dev->sec_per_pl = dev->sec_per_pg * dev->nr_planes; >> - dev->sec_per_blk = dev->sec_per_pl * dev->pgs_per_blk; >> + dev->sec_per_blk = dev->sec_per_pg * dev->pgs_per_blk; >> + dev->sec_per_pl = dev->sec_per_blk * grp->num_blk; >> dev->sec_per_lun = dev->sec_per_blk * dev->blks_per_lun; >> dev->nr_luns = dev->luns_per_chnl * dev->nr_chnls; >> >> - dev->total_blocks = dev->nr_planes * >> - dev->blks_per_lun * >> + dev->total_blocks = dev->blks_per_lun * >> dev->luns_per_chnl * >> dev->nr_chnls; >> dev->total_pages = dev->total_blocks * dev->pgs_per_blk; >> > > The reason I had it as before, was because I wanted to drive the device in > either single/double/quad read/write/erase plane mode. That way we could get > away with only managing 1/4 or 1/2 of the block metadata. > > What is your use case? It could make sense, but it will require a little > more work to build up the framework for having the various modes. i.e. > detect supported plane mode, make a explicit decision about which plane mode > to always use (or dynamically) and afterwards allocate the appropriate data > structures. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/