Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:12:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:12:45 -0500 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:39183 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:12:44 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3 From: Robert Love To: Andrew Morton Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com In-Reply-To: <20030228131206.22fc077c.akpm@digeo.com> References: <20030228131206.22fc077c.akpm@digeo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1046467381.1346.261.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-1) Date: 28 Feb 2003 16:23:01 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 804 Lines: 21 On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 16:12, Andrew Morton wrote: > - The longstanding problem wherein a kernel build makes my X desktop > unusable is 90% fixed - it is still possible to trigger stalls, but > they are less severe, and you actually have to work at it a bit to > make them happen. That is odd, because I do not see any changes in here that would improve interactivity. This looks to be pretty much purely the HT stuff. Andrew, if you drop this patch, your X desktop usability drops? Ingo, is there something in here that I am missing? Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/