Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 20:38:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 20:38:14 -0500 Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU ([129.94.242.29]:44807 "HELO note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 20:38:00 -0500 From: Neil Brown To: Alan Cox Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 12:37:42 +1100 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14993.51814.34672.957715@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: problems with reiserfs + nfs using 2.4.2-pre4 In-Reply-To: message from Alan Cox on Tuesday February 20 In-Reply-To: <14993.48376.203279.390285@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under Emacs 20.7.2 X-face: [Gw_3E*Gng}4rRrKRYotwlE?.2|**#s9D > This may seem like a lot, but several of these are already > > requirements which most filesystems don't meet, and other are there > > to tidy-up interfaces and make locking more straight forward. > > As a 2.5 thing it sounds like a very sensible path. It will also provide > some of the operations groundwork needed for file systems that can only use > NFS4 temporary handles I had wanted to get it in before 2.4, but didn't quite make it. I guess that means that, from your perspective, nfs exporting of reiserfs remains an extra-kernel patch at least until 2.5 starts up and the code has been tested extensively and it gets backported to 2.4, or maybe even until 2.6/3.0. Such is life. NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/