Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 18:12:31 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: clean up the kbuild tree?
Message-ID: <20151124021231.GE8438@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
References: <20151115112705.0bf4f0ed@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20151115175848.GD10150@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
 <5649D3B9.7020701@suse.cz>
 <20151121010033.GB8438@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
 <s5h4mgfzkno.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <s5h4mgfzkno.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 880
Lines: 23

> > 5.x is better than 4.x but it's still a slower. It's also not incremential.
> 
> At the last time I tested with the latest 5.x and stock binutils on
> openSUSE Tumbleweed, I failed to build, unfortunately.  Partly the
> detection of gcc version doesn't work for 5.x, and partly something is

Really? It work for me with gcc 5

> missing in binutils side, although it's already built with plugin.

Yes it needs HJ Lu's Linux binutils, not the standard FSF binutils.
The patch to fix LTO with ld -r was submitted to standard binutils, but they
didn't want to fix the issue.


-Andi
-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/