Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 07:37:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 07:37:44 -0500 Received: from 205-158-62-139.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.139]:20394 "HELO spf1.us.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 07:37:43 -0500 Message-ID: <20030301124759.10054.qmail@linuxmail.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404) From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" To: "Martin J. Bligh" , ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: akpm@digeo.com Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 20:47:59 +0800 Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] AIM9 results. 2.4.19 vs 2.5.58 vs 2.5.63 X-Originating-Ip: 193.76.202.244 X-Originating-Server: ws5-1.us4.outblaze.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3195 Lines: 86 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:16:16 -0800 To: Paolo Ciarrocchi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] AIM9 results. 2.4.19 vs 2.5.58 vs 2.5.63 [...] > Could you compare 63 mainline to -mjb or -mm with objrmap patches in? > I think you'll get significant improvements on the tests above. Of course I can. And here it goes the results: 2.4.19 2.5.63 2.5.63-mjb2 creat-clo 10040 19.4223 19422.31 File Creations and Closes/second creat-clo 10010 84.3157 84315.68 File Creations and Closes/second creat-clo 10000 87.4 87400.00 File Creations and Closes/second ^^^mjb2 is faster than 2.5.63 brk_test 10010 48.951 832167.83 System Memory Allocations/second brk_test 10020 41.018 697305.39 System Memory Allocations/second brk_test 10000 41.3 702100.00 System Memory Allocations/second ^^^Still slower than 2.4.19 signal_test 10000 166.1 166100.00 Signal Traps/second signal_test 10000 148.3 148300.00 Signal Traps/second signal_test 10010 151.748 151748.25 Signal Traps/second ^^^Still slower than 2.4.19 exec_test 10000 13.8 69.00 Program Loads/second exec_test 10020 12.7745 63.87 Program Loads/second exec_test 10010 12.987 64.94 Program Loads/second ^^^Still slower than 2.4.19 fork_test 10000 44.8 4480.00 Task Creations/second fork_test 10000 23.2 2320.00 Task Creations/second fork_test 10020 30.0399 3003.99 Task Creations/second ^^^mjb2 is faster than 2.5.63 link_test 10000 155.3 9783.90 Link/Unlink Pairs/second link_test 10010 160.739 10126.57 Link/Unlink Pairs/second link_test 10010 150.25 9465.73 Link/Unlink Pairs/second ^^^mmh... strange array_rtns 10010 13.6863 273.73 Linear Systems Solved/second array_rtns 10020 11.2774 225.55 Linear Systems Solved/second array_rtns 10050 13.5323 270.65 Linear Systems Solved/second ^^^^^^mjb2 is faster than 2.5.63 mem_rtns_1 10000 27.7 831000.00 Dynamic Memory Operations/second mem_rtns_1 10020 22.7545 682634.73 Dynamic Memory Operations/second mem_rtns_1 10020 25.0499 751497.01 Dynamic Memory Operations/second ^^^mjb2 is faster than 2.5.63 misc_rtns_1 10000 782.2 7822.00 Auxiliary Loops/second misc_rtns_1 10000 686.9 6869.00 Auxiliary Loops/second misc_rtns_1 10000 709.7 7097.00 Auxiliary Loops/second ^^^mjb2 is faster than 2.5.63 dgram_pipe 10000 2357.8 235780.00 DataGram Pipe Messages/second dgram_pipe 10000 1978 197800.00 DataGram Pipe Messages/second dgram_pipe 10000 2078.1 207810.00 DataGram Pipe Messages/second ^^^mjb2 is faster than 2.5.63 Let me know if you need further tests/information. Ciao, Paolo -- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr Powered by Outblaze - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/