Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:01:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:01:43 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:20374 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:01:42 -0500 Subject: Re: anticipatory scheduling questions From: Alan Cox To: David Lang Cc: Andrew Morton , Felipe Alfaro Solana , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1046538908.23347.2.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 01 Mar 2003 17:15:10 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 571 Lines: 12 On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 11:51, David Lang wrote: > wasn't there something about Evolution having problems with the change to > child-runs-first-on-fork logic several months ago? There was a problem with a bug in the AF_UNIX socket layer causing evolution to fail. I don't remember a fork based one. Its quite possible there is - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/