Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:17:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:17:17 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:31126 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:17:17 -0500 Subject: Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed BitKeeper clone From: Alan Cox To: Larry McVoy Cc: Ben Collins , Pavel Machek , andrea@e-mind.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20030301161144.GB24536@work.bitmover.com> References: <20030226200208.GA392@elf.ucw.cz> <20030301152820.GA24536@work.bitmover.com> <20030301160222.GS2896@phunnypharm.org> <20030301161144.GB24536@work.bitmover.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1046539842.23347.11.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 01 Mar 2003 17:30:42 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 653 Lines: 16 On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 16:11, Larry McVoy wrote: > He's not allowed to say "BitBucket is a GPL-ed clone of BitKeeper" > because that implies that BitBucket does what BitKeeper does and nothing > could be farther from the truth. Something is wrong, I agree with Larry. He should instead say "A tool for accessing bitkeeper repositories" or "bitbucket compatible proprietary tools are available from .. " ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/