Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932349AbbKYBbI (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2015 20:31:08 -0500 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([218.249.47.110]:64895 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754457AbbKYBbF (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2015 20:31:05 -0500 X-Listener-Flag: 11101 Message-ID: <1448415054.13079.9.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] MT8173 IOMMU SUPPORT From: Yong Wu To: Thierry Reding CC: Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "Daniel Thompson" , Joerg Roedel , , , Robin Murphy , Tomasz Figa , Rob Herring , , Matthias Brugger , , , , Sricharan R , , , Daniel Kurtz , "Sasha Hauer" , , Lucas Stach Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:30:54 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20151124103819.GE17658@ulmo.nvidia.com> References: <1444357388-30257-1-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> <20151014125620.GQ27420@8bytes.org> <1445488802.27202.67.camel@mhfsdcap03> <20151023092636.GX27420@8bytes.org> <1448344693.13079.6.camel@mhfsdcap03> <20151124103819.GE17658@ulmo.nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1691 Lines: 44 On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 11:38 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:58:13PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 11:26 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:40:02PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > > > > But the mtk-iommu depend on the drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c(mtk-iommu > > > > has called a function of the mtk-smi). > > > > So if there is dependence here, How should we do to merge them? > > > > > > I can surely merge mtk-smi too, if it gets proper Reviewed-by and > > > Acked-by tags from the maintainer(s). > > > > > > > > > Joerg > > > > > Hi Joerg, > > > > About the driver/memory/, We don't know who is his maintainer. > > MAINTAINERS file don't have drivers/memory maintainer. > > From the history in drivers/memory/ it looks like most of the > > drivers land with an ack from the architecture maintainer. > > And Matthias Brugger is our "ARM/Mediatek SoC support" maintainer. > > > > Then do you mean that we need Matthias's ACK or whom others? > > Yes, I think the sub-architecture maintainer's ACK is probably going to > be as good as it gets. Historically drivers/memory hasn't had enough of > a common ground to instate a framework. > > Thierry Got it. Thanks very much for your reply. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/