Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 17:34:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 17:34:54 -0500 Received: from dhcp93-dsl-usw3.w-link.net ([206.129.84.93]:40144 "EHLO grok.yi.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 17:34:53 -0500 Message-ID: <3E6137EC.4010202@candelatech.com> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 14:45:00 -0800 From: Ben Greear Organization: Candela Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew McGregor CC: Stephen Corey , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel tuning for high latency satellite link?? References: <000001c2e00b$71bb7d50$0301a8c0@corey> <132088132.1046604929@[192.168.0.1]> In-Reply-To: <132088132.1046604929@[192.168.0.1]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 812 Lines: 23 Andrew McGregor wrote: > It should do OK by default, but you might want to read RFC 3150 for some > ideas for things to do to help. > > Andrew Testing I have done shows it will probably NOT be ok by default, especially if you have any significant bandwidth on your satellite link. I would suggest increasing the tcp_[rw]mem buffers at least. Ben -- Ben Greear President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/