Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 21:13:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 21:13:17 -0500 Received: from h-64-105-35-98.SNVACAID.covad.net ([64.105.35.98]:7050 "EHLO freya.yggdrasil.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 21:13:16 -0500 From: "Adam J. Richter" Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 18:23:21 -0800 Message-Id: <200303020223.SAA13660@adam.yggdrasil.com> To: diegocg@teleline.es Subject: Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Cc: andrea@suse.de, hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@janik.cz, pavel@ucw.cz Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1980 Lines: 38 Arador wrote: >Why to waste time trying to clone a >tool such as bitkeeper? Why not to support things like subversion? "Why" depends on one's priorities. Some of us the linux-kernel crowd are interested in being able to interface with the bitkeeper-using kernel developers a bit more efficiently. The developers currently using bitkeeper started using it when these other systems were already available, so I doubt that improving another free version control system will do more for free software adoption than providing BK compatability (I don't know if that is a priority for you). Note that Subversion, in particular, is GPL incompatible and uses its own underlying repository format that isn't particularly compatible with anything else and required a web server plus some minor web server extension when last I checked. As I previously mentioned, Bitkeeper is based on sccs for which a GPL-compatible clone exists: cssc, and sccs format is used in a lot of other places as well. So the result of cloning the "uber-cvs" in bitkeeper might actually have more applicability than trying to extract the same layer from subversion, even though Subversion is freer than BitKeeper. Different people have different priorities or order them differently. If you contribute to aegis, prcs, or even Subversion, I think that's great. If you produce a separate GPL compatible "uber-CVS" layer that way, I would be interested in hearing about it. Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 575 Oroville Road adam@yggdrasil.com \ / Milpitas, California 95035 +1 408 309-6081 | g g d r a s i l United States of America "Free Software For The Rest Of Us." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/