Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753381AbbKZS1n (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:27:43 -0500 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:46377 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752853AbbKZS1m (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:27:42 -0500 Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:27:36 +0100 From: Thomas Petazzoni To: Marcin Wojtas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch, jason@lakedaemon.net, gregory.clement@free-electrons.com, simon.guinot@sequanux.org, nadavh@marvell.com, alior@marvell.com, xswang@marvell.com, myair@marvell.com, nitroshift@yahoo.com, jaz@semihalf.com, tn@semihalf.com, Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 2/6] net: mvneta: fix bit assignment in MVNETA_RXQ_CONFIG_REG Message-ID: <20151126192736.662634d3@free-electrons.com> In-Reply-To: <1448561293-16431-3-git-send-email-mw@semihalf.com> References: <1448561293-16431-1-git-send-email-mw@semihalf.com> <1448561293-16431-3-git-send-email-mw@semihalf.com> Organization: Free Electrons X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1210 Lines: 33 Dear Marcin Wojtas, On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:08:09 +0100, Marcin Wojtas wrote: > MVNETA_RXQ_HW_BUF_ALLOC bit which controls enabling hardware buffer > allocation was mistakenly set as BIT(1). This commit fixes the assignment. > > Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas > Reviewed-by: Gregory CLEMENT > Cc: # v3.8+ > Fixes: c5aff18204da ("net: mvneta: driver for Marvell Armada 370/XP network > unit") > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) What is the user-visible impact of this bug? Indeed, the code is wrong, but things were working fine until now. So I am not questioning that this patch should be merged, but only questioning whether the stable tag is appropriate. Same questions for your patch 3/6. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/