Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755162AbbK0R6E (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:58:04 -0500 Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.26]:54440 "EHLO lb2-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754809AbbK0R6B (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:58:01 -0500 Message-ID: <1448647077.6523.33.camel@tiscali.nl> Subject: Re: gigaset: freeing an active object From: Paul Bolle To: Sasha Levin Cc: isdn@linux-pingi.de, davem@davemloft.net, tilman@imap.cc, gigaset307x-common@lists.sourceforge.net, LKML , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , syzkaller Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 18:57:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <56587467.8050102@oracle.com> References: <56587467.8050102@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 (3.16.5-3.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3072 Lines: 65 Hi Sascha, On vr, 2015-11-27 at 10:19 -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: > Fuzzing with syzkaller on the latest -next kernel produced this error: (syzkaller is new to me. I'll have to do some web searches.) > [ 413.536749] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 25400 at lib/debugobjects.c:263 > debug_print_object+0x1c4/0x1e0() > [ 413.538111] ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type: > timer_list hint: delayed_work_timer_fn+0x0/0x90 > [ 413.539598] Modules linked > in:3470693efef57268844f02f5de3ab392d8cf5e209671ddd87163cb964c510659 > [ 413.540448] CPU: 6 PID: 25400 Comm: syzkaller_execu Not tainted > 4.4.0-rc2-next-20151126-sasha-00005-g00d303e-dirty #2653 > [ 413.547614] Call Trace: > [ 413.548077] [] dump_stack+0x72/0xb7 > [ 413.548765] [] warn_slowpath_common+0x113/0x140 > [ 413.551151] [] warn_slowpath_fmt+0xcb/0x100 > [ 413.554295] [] debug_print_object+0x1c4/0x1e0 > [ 413.556592] [] > __debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x215/0x7a0 > [ 413.560526] [] > debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x2c/0x40 > [ 413.561328] [] kfree+0x1fc/0x2f0 > [ 413.561970] [] gigaset_freecshw+0xe1/0x120 > [ 413.562723] [] gigaset_freecs+0x2ad/0x600 > [ 413.564240] [] gigaset_tty_close+0x210/0x280 > [ 413.565774] [] tty_ldisc_close.isra.1+0xc2/0xd0 > [ 413.566550] [] tty_ldisc_kill+0x4b/0x170 > [ 413.567253] [] tty_ldisc_release+0x183/0x240 > [ 413.568000] [] tty_release+0xd1c/0xe80 > [ 413.570176] [] __fput+0x32a/0x680 > [ 413.570888] [] ____fput+0x1a/0x20 > [ 413.571565] [] task_work_run+0x19c/0x1e0 > [ 413.572290] [] do_exit+0xdf7/0x28f0 > [ 413.576188] [] do_group_exit+0x1b5/0x300 > [ 413.576905] [] get_signal+0x1182/0x1360 > [ 413.577627] [] do_signal+0x93/0x1690 > [ 413.584630] [] exit_to_usermode_loop+0xc0/0x1e0 > [ 413.585412] [] > prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x10b/0x140 > [ 413.586187] [] retint_user+0x8/0x23 Thanks for the report. I'll look into it. A question that's nagging me for some time now is: how many people use gigaset drivers (and, actually ISDN drivers in general) while running recent kernel releases? I haven't seen reports that suggest people really do that for some time now. So, just to be absolutely sure: this was generated with a kernel that used the ser-gigaset driver without actually using the related hardware, wasn't it? (That hardware is a clunky, self powered device that requires a good old serial port.) Thanks, Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/