Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 04:30:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 04:30:17 -0500 Received: from mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com ([216.71.84.35]:7722 "EHLO mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 04:30:06 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 03:30:02 -0600 (CST) From: Jeff Garzik To: Bill Nottingham cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: unresloved symbols in 2.4.1 In-Reply-To: <20010220012710.A5267@nostromo.devel.redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Eugene Danilchenko (eugene@kriljon.ru) said: > > cd /lib/modules/2.4.1; \ > > mkdir -p pcmcia; \ > > find kernel -path '*/pcmcia/*' -name '*.o' | xargs -i -r ln -sf ../{} pcmcia > > if [ -r System.map ]; then /sbin/depmod -ae -F System.map 2.4.1; fi > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.1/kernel/fs/binfmt_elf.o > > depmod: get_pte_slow > > depmod: __handle_bad_pmd > > > > System: RedHat 6.2 > > on system installed: > > modutils-2.4.2-1 > > > > What does it mean. > > It means that compiling ELF binary support as a module doesn't work right. > > > and what have i to do to avoid it? > > Compile it in (CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y). If you're using Red Hat Linux 6.2, > compiling it as a module is an incredibly bad idea anyway. I wonder if we shouldn't disable CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=m, until we have a good use case and some good testers. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/