Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 03:43:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 03:43:20 -0500 Received: from modemcable092.130-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.200.130.92]:463 "EHLO montezuma.mastecende.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 03:43:19 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 03:51:46 -0500 (EST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: zwane@montezuma.mastecende.com To: ChristopherHuhn cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel Bug at spinlock.h ?! In-Reply-To: <3E630E3D.8060405@GSI.de> Message-ID: References: <3E630E3D.8060405@GSI.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1126 Lines: 27 On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, ChristopherHuhn wrote: > Hi folks, > > we have some problems with the 2.4.20 kernel on our linux farm, mainly - but > not exclusivly - on our batch processing 2x2GHz Xeon (with hyperthreading), > Intel e7500 supermicro P4-DPE boxes running - almost plain - Debian woody. > > On these boxes (ca. 60) we sometimes get a kernel panic after an uptime of 2 > days or more. The process causing the panic is sometimes a users number > crunching process but more often ksoftirqd_CPU0 or swapper. > > Today we got this profound error msg: > Kernel Bug at /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.20/include/asm/spinlock.h:105! Sounds like possible memory corruption (can you vouch for the reliability of your RAM?) Might be worthwhile posting the oops in it's entirety. Is EIP normally in __run_timers? Do you run a heavy networking load? Zwane -- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/