Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 06:46:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 06:46:57 -0500 Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:11524 "EHLO 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 06:46:56 -0500 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200303020930.h229U039000440@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> Subject: Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone To: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig) Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 09:30:00 +0000 (GMT) Cc: Pavel@Janik.cz, pavel@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030302091130.A11536@infradead.org> from "Christoph Hellwig" at Mar 02, 2003 09:11:30 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 854 Lines: 22 > But anyway, don't you think Pavel is free to develop whatever free > software he likes to develop instead of following you political > agenda? What is the goal of the BitBucket project, though? To develop a version control system, or to annoy Larry? I haven't seen a single post to the list saying, "If we were designing a version control system dedicated to the Linux kernel, what would you like to see in it?". Before I started work on my bug database, I spent a week or so discussing it on the list with people. Why doesn't somebody start working on a dedicated kernel version control system? John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/