Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 07:42:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 07:42:32 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:51098 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 07:42:31 -0500 Subject: Re: [CHECKER] potential deadlocks From: Alan Cox To: Dawson Engler Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <200303030605.h2365oK08706@csl.stanford.edu> References: <200303030605.h2365oK08706@csl.stanford.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1046699795.5889.12.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 03 Mar 2003 13:56:36 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 592 Lines: 13 On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 06:05, Dawson Engler wrote: > BTW, are there known deadlocks (harmless or otherwise)? Debugging > the checker is a bit hard since false negatives are silent... 2.4.21pre5 has one in the scsi reset handler for ide-scsi, however its going to depend on your tools following function pointer chains and stuff to find it I fear - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/