Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755743AbbLAJKK (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2015 04:10:10 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.220.47]:36157 "EHLO mail-pa0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754799AbbLAJKE (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2015 04:10:04 -0500 Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 18:11:04 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Minchan Kim Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Kyeongdon Kim , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] zram: try vmalloc() after kmalloc() Message-ID: <20151201091104.GA483@swordfish> References: <1448597449-17579-1-git-send-email-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20151201051652.GA894@swordfish> <565D3FCD.3060503@lge.com> <20151201071542.GB894@swordfish> <20151201081620.GA27574@bbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151201081620.GA27574@bbox> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1460 Lines: 43 On (12/01/15 17:16), Minchan Kim wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:15:42PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > On (12/01/15 15:35), Kyeongdon Kim wrote: > > [..] > > > @test #4 > > > kmalloc(f) > > > __vmalloc(f) > > > // cannot find failure both until now > > > > > > log message (test #4) : > > > <4>[ 641.440468][7] KDKIM: zcomp_lz4_create: 24: ret = ffffffc002190000 > > > > > > <4>[ 922.182980][7] KDKIM: zcomp_lz4_create: 24: ret = ffffffc002208000 > > > > > > <4>[ 923.197593][7] KDKIM: zcomp_lz4_create: 24: ret = ffffffc002020000 > > > > > > <4>[ 939.813499][7] KDKIM: zcomp_lz4_create: 24: ret = ffffffc0020a0000 > > > > Thanks! > > > > > So,is there another problem if we remove the flag from both sides? > > > > > > > Technically, '~__GFP_NOMEMALLOC' is what we've been doing for some time (well, > > always); and, as Minchan noted, zsmalloc does not depend on emergency pools. > > > > I vote for removal of __GFP_NOMEMALLOC from both kmalloc() and __vmalloc(). > > > > (user can make ->max_strm big enough to deplete emergency mem; but I tend to > > ignore it). > > > > Minchan? > > Agree. Do you mind resending patches? :) OK, will do later today. Thanks. -ss -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/