Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:41:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:41:07 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:49563 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:41:06 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] cciss: add passthrough ioctl From: Alan Cox To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Stephen Cameron , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20030303152706.C30584@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20030303032640.GA13102@zuul.cca.cpqcorp.net> <20030303152706.C30584@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1046710511.6530.18.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 03 Mar 2003 16:55:11 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 847 Lines: 18 On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 15:27, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:26:40AM +0600, Stephen Cameron wrote: > > Because, in order to flash the array controller firmware, > > it's got to be done that way... > > I don't buy this. Sorry. What's against creating a device for this > controller itself ? > (And yes, the kernel could use a formal ioctl number for "upgrade firmware") All the other devices supporting firmware upgrade use ioctls for it. Its one of those suitably obscure things where you don't care too much about the api and you certainly don't want to get the wrong device! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/