Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:07:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:07:35 -0500 Received: from ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com ([161.114.1.207]:526 "EHLO ztxmail03.ztx.compaq.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:07:34 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Subject: RE: [PATCH] cciss: add passthrough ioctl Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:17:55 -0600 Message-ID: <45B36A38D959B44CB032DA427A6E10640451336D@cceexc18.americas.cpqcorp.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [PATCH] cciss: add passthrough ioctl Thread-Index: AcLhmVuLQaJipK7gSJKvr5NQ4w33iQAACvjg From: "Cameron, Steve" To: "Arjan van de Ven" Cc: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Mar 2003 16:17:56.0365 (UTC) FILETIME=[7334C3D0:01C2E1A0] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 711 Lines: 22 > On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:26:40AM +0600, Stephen Cameron wrote: > > Because, in order to flash the array controller firmware, > > it's got to be done that way... > > I don't buy this. Sorry. What's against creating a device for this > controller itself ? > (And yes, the kernel could use a formal ioctl number for "upgrade firmware") Arg. Now I wish I didn't already port that code to 10 distributions. Please shoot me. How do you want it done? -- steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/