Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:34:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:34:42 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:57243 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:34:41 -0500 Subject: RE: [PATCH] cciss: add passthrough ioctl From: Alan Cox To: "Cameron, Steve" Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <45B36A38D959B44CB032DA427A6E10640451336D@cceexc18.americas.cpqcorp.net> References: <45B36A38D959B44CB032DA427A6E10640451336D@cceexc18.americas.cpqcorp.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1046713702.6530.34.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 03 Mar 2003 17:48:22 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 962 Lines: 24 On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 16:17, Cameron, Steve wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:26:40AM +0600, Stephen Cameron wrote: > > > Because, in order to flash the array controller firmware, > > > it's got to be done that way... > > > > I don't buy this. Sorry. What's against creating a device for this > > controller itself ? > > (And yes, the kernel could use a formal ioctl number for "upgrade firmware") > > Arg. Now I wish I didn't already port that code to 10 distributions. > Please shoot me. > > How do you want it done? I really think it should stay as it is for now. Maybe in 2.7 we need to have the firmware update argument, but we need to have it about *all* related drivers and do it once and right. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/