Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757306AbbLBBSe (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2015 20:18:34 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:51358 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751915AbbLBBSd convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2015 20:18:33 -0500 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <20151201222223.GA27480@obsidianresearch.com> References: <1448996309-15220-1-git-send-email-jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> <20151201213351.GC5071@intel.com> <20151201222223.GA27480@obsidianresearch.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] tpm_tis: Clean up force module parameter From: Peter Huewe Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 17:15:14 -0800 To: Jason Gunthorpe , Jarkko Sakkinen CC: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin Wilck , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=F6nig?= Message-ID: <7BE9D077-675D-42FE-9461-81317CCA3762@gmx.de> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:gIkSfuc0dCXyE1LcuMHSyy6dB4dqiXmlVCcjRv4z69QqLG8SlKZ ruxDk1gEAETjaNu7AyJfi7yRlkmYptI15dkqOpXWIdR2ydd3kccU/x6x/7s83weKXuF54ll dMccuAO1s51+oGBkSce5GRHhAJt6537dOHLcq9bqm5Zh7kSp7ZFrqoKpKjURiSqfjJ8Gvkz VjyYHfcNXhiEx2Llp/vbA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:aaHTy4sfhHM=:CvvOka91Nxn6ghKR45izWx cJ0a5poD7OQIC3W6NuvauqA/NXEDZNe4pzu7L99KaYGBu1n0t1mia88A4ZmdUF8ELmxeIYUAj kKph819Z7Yh7ITLEqkaCqJBMqHWJokuhAyrHgmFhpuKfiDhEKQ7nMmv+AdkrJF3AJPmV/MYOb +EbGUKVYNvDDiz+QI4sRK6st8v6xwxEbVVVJ/bX/ZkYAUNtS9GA4x+y8kWXOoQBCFIXTJ3Xid tsfNt5xh1r6m9xZgbK7zFkC1TeOkMaxwV6XiPcZj1HSPB1dzQaZbP/ffsS2VklGcsSonqR4tt 4GUC8KnJyz1MVyAlFWrdcnkyKAAAag6T+e6GG4bAOgBgJBWzIGQenUVff6M9WtMSOMs6d1pYi CPBrj/gift90TYzGqBJiAh7avBCsEROkwPLyoo1IPjlU7LZ5HQ+B3sJ2EbLRAHGCNmjh0VWTD vefhkb0GqU92ZjWzHAkQahRBWL4Wh0wbtDeGao8sjAgSmHk6gKWjiZZEP1hnSLjUHd7BF90jx Oxr+8af8uXmWj0qcUMvwAYncqXXQulvCOvo5SuBWpDZuD0faxMbZMTV9WcLEkOxP9p00tnuuY Vh63fQ65jbnoCd1ts757abKjz6Jyl+wLQfZQ5veOJdQjiLOfiCfrXa3CsOtaTVfxxrmhcTnC7 jflaFUrQEc2oIGwMBHCjOdh4ySGFaUM4DdfhaGXbY7rKcolqKir9T1bQq8rBfl+QeEu0G6eBn 4s1qrV+J7ZZ0Si5oX4P/r+ZhuoCANaRQ6NarNH3KVIAnC7lC0Kq0u9ejlhNnblwXIrKKq/HKe e2gpyUd Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1409 Lines: 42 Am 1. Dezember 2015 14:22:23 PST, schrieb Jason Gunthorpe : >On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:33:51PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> I went through the patches and didn't see anything that would shock >me >> enough not to apply the patches in the current if they also work when >> tested *but* are these release critical for Linux v4.4? >> >> I got a bit confused about the discussion that was going on about >"where >> to fix the probe" crash whether or not both it should be fixed in >both >> places. > >I'm also confused by that.. > >It sounds like force=1 is broken in 4.4 right now - do we care? Should >we fix this by using Martin's patch? I'm not 100% sure if force=1 is broken in 4.3 as well, as I oops when I have my tpm_crb loaded and then call modprobe tpm_tis force=1 Peter > >These changes are complex enough they really shouldn't go into 4.4 >unless absolutely necessary. > >> Could you possibly make these apply on top of security/next and >> re-submit if needed? > >It isn't trivial to reorder all 10 patches to do this, I'd like to >know we need to do this for sure first. Uwe? > >Jason -- Sent from my mobile -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/