Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:07:30 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, nsekhar@ti.com, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v02 04/15] dmaengine: edma: Add support for DMA filter
 mapping to slave devices
Message-ID: <20151202043730.GA1854@localhost>
References: <1448891145-10766-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
 <1448891145-10766-5-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
 <20151201172212.GC1696@localhost>
 <1589780.JL62pLTh05@wuerfel>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1589780.JL62pLTh05@wuerfel>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 795
Lines: 20

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:20:28PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 December 2015 22:52:12 Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 03:45:34PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > > Add support for providing device to filter_fn mapping so client drivers
> > > can switch to use the dma_request_chan() API.
> > 
> > Any reason why we dont want to go with DT based only for edma here?
> 
> I think the OMAP2 based platforms using edma are all DT-only, but mach-davinci
> would need a lot of work for that.

Okay sound fine then

-- 
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/