Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:04:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:04:11 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:3756 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:04:09 -0500 Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 10:56:46 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20030303.105646.02089773.davem@redhat.com> To: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com Cc: terje.eggestad@scali.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: anyone ever done multicast AF_UNIX sockets? From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <3E63A8CB.2090307@nortelnetworks.com> References: <3E6399F1.10303@nortelnetworks.com> <20030303.095641.87696857.davem@redhat.com> <3E63A8CB.2090307@nortelnetworks.com> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 730 Lines: 17 From: Chris Friesen Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 14:11:07 -0500 I haven't done UDP bandwidth testing--I need to check how lmbench did it for the unix socket and do the same for UDP. Local TCP was far slower than unix sockets though. That result is system specific and depends upon how the data and datastructures hit the cpu cachelines in the kernel. TCP bandwidth is slightly faster than AF_UNIX bandwidth on my sparc64 boxes for example. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/