Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:39:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:39:25 -0500 Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:65030 "EHLO 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:39:24 -0500 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200303031949.h23JnGsZ001875@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> Subject: Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone To: pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:49:16 +0000 (GMT) Cc: root@chaos.analogic.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, hch@infradead.org, pavel@janik.cz, pavel@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030303193724.GA19556@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> from "Pavel Machek" at Mar 03, 2003 08:37:24 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 763 Lines: 17 > > It's only if you want to use several version control systems in > > parallel that it might be an issue, but if a single, free, version > > control system is in use, I don't see why that would be necessary. > > But you *will* be using bitkeeper along with something else, because > linus is not going to switch unless that something else is well > tested, creating chicken-egg problem. Well, you could try convincing Alan to use it for the -ac trees, or the 2.2 kernel to get it tested with a real dataset. John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/