Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758907AbbLBQut (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:50:49 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:33762 "EHLO mail-wm0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754743AbbLBQur (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:50:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1449062733.32764.53.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> References: <01d101d12c46$2de43b40$89acb1c0$@samsung.com> <1448983985.25582.35.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <20151201.143047.82022857078130793.davem@davemloft.net> <1449062733.32764.53.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 22:20:46 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] net: thunderx: Increase transmit queue length From: Sunil Kovvuri To: Eric Dumazet Cc: David Miller , Pavel Fedin , Linux Netdev List , LKML , LAKML , Sunil Goutham , Sunil Goutham Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 467 Lines: 10 > > If the performance increase is 4 %, then surely using twice more memory > is not worth it. I haven't mentioned anywhere that i am seeing 4% increase in performance. Anyways as said already i will recheck and resubmit. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/