Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:52:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:52:21 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:774 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:52:21 -0500 Message-ID: <3E63ED14.5090809@pobox.com> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 19:02:28 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Lang CC: Andrea Arcangeli , Larry McVoy , Alan Cox , Arador , "Adam J. Richter" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , pavel@janik.cz, pavel@ucw.cz Subject: Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed *notrademarkhere* clone References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 793 Lines: 27 David Lang wrote: > On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > >>Just curious, this also means that at least around the 80% of merges >>in Linus's tree is submitted via a bitkeeper pull, right? >> >>Andrea > > > remember how Linus works, all normal patches get copied into a single > large patch file as he reads his mail then he runs patch to apply them to > the tree. I think this would make the entire batch of messages look like > one cset. Not correct. His commits properly separate the patches out into individual csets. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/