Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757470AbbLCAAL (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2015 19:00:11 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:52177 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757349AbbLCAAH (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2015 19:00:07 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 00:59:48 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King - ARM Linux , Jason Cooper , Benjamin Cama , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Detlef Vollmann , Gregory CLEMENT , Sebastian Hesselbarth Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ARM: orion5x/dove/mv78xx0 multiplatform Message-ID: <20151202235948.GA1751@lunn.ch> References: <1448466557-435335-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <20151202202240.GH8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20151202203810.GH9866@lunn.ch> <10084728.p75H39SaXO@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <10084728.p75H39SaXO@wuerfel> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 768 Lines: 19 > > I agree. We have multiplatform dove already, it is in mach-mvebu. Do > > we really need both mach-dove and mach-mvebu dove in one kernel? > > I'm also fine with deleting mach-dove. Ah, maybe i worded that badly. By "in one kernel" i mean kernel binary. We should keep mach-dove, and allow a mach-dove build of the kernel. But there is no reason for that build to be multi-platform. We already have multi-platform dove via mvebu. Anyway, i see your v2 patches do leave mach-dove as a single platform kernel. Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/