Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:28:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:28:17 -0500 Received: from mx02.cyberus.ca ([216.191.240.26]:5391 "EHLO mx02.cyberus.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:28:15 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:38:17 -0500 (EST) From: jamal To: Terje Eggestad cc: Chris Friesen , linux-kernel , "" , "" , "" Subject: Re: anyone ever done multicast AF_UNIX sockets? In-Reply-To: <1046734165.27924.263.camel@eggis1> Message-ID: <20030303212628.M67734@shell.cyberus.ca> References: <3E5E7081.6020704@nortelnetworks.com> <1046695876.7731.78.camel@pc-16.office .scali.no> <3E638C51.2000904@nortelnetworks.com> <1046720360.28127.209.camel@eggis1> <3E63D73A.2000402@nortelnetworks.com> <1046734165.27924.263.camel@eggis1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 879 Lines: 32 Hi Terje, On Mon, 4 Mar 2003, Terje Eggestad wrote: > How do you design a protocol that uses multicast to send a request to do > work? > > All uses I can think of right now of multicast/broadcast is: > * Discovery, like in NIS. > * Announcements like in OSPF. > * update like in NTP broadcast > I know we are digressing away from main discussion ... The concept of reliable multicast is known to be useful. Look at(for some sample apps): http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/rmt-charter.html But we are talking about a distributed system in that context. Agreed, reliability and multicast do not always make sense. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/