Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754720AbbLCVJU (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:09:20 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:39091 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754089AbbLCVJS (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:09:18 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 22:09:11 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Tejun Heo Cc: Ulrich Obergfell , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: warn if memory reclaim tries to flush !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueue Message-ID: <20151203210911.GZ17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20151203002810.GJ19878@mtj.duckdns.org> <20151203093350.GP17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20151203100018.GO11639@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20151203144811.GA27463@mtj.duckdns.org> <20151203150442.GR17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20151203150604.GC27463@mtj.duckdns.org> <20151203192616.GJ27463@mtj.duckdns.org> <20151203204313.GX17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20151203205632.GM27463@mtj.duckdns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151203205632.GM27463@mtj.duckdns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1212 Lines: 26 On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 03:56:32PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > So, if I'm not mistaken, those are all marking tasks which can be > depended upon during memory reclaim and we do want to catch them all. Up to a point yes, these are things that want to be reliable during reclaim, but lacking memory reserves and usage bounds (which we discussed last at lsf/mm) these are just wanna-be. > PF_MEMALLOC shouldn't depend on something which require memory to be > reclaimed to guarantee forward progress. PF_MEMALLOC basically avoids reclaim for any memory allocation while its set. The thing is, even if your workqueue has WQ_MEM_RECLAIM set, it will not hit the mayday button until you're completely full flat out of memory. At which point you're probably boned anyway, because, as per the above, all that code assumes there's _some_ memory to be had. One solution is to always fail maybe_create_worker() when PF_MEMALLOC is set, thus always hitting the mayday button. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/