Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 23:03:17 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
        Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen@intel.com>,
        "Rantala, Valtteri" <valtteri.rantala@intel.com>,
        stable@kernel.vger.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Limit the busy wait on requests to 2us not
 10ms!
Message-ID: <20151203220317.GE14427@amd>
References: <1447594364-4206-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
 <1447594364-4206-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1447594364-4206-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1800
Lines: 56

Hi!

> Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/12/621
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Cc; "Rogozhkin, Dmitry V" <dmitry.v.rogozhkin@intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen@intel.com>
> Cc: "Rantala, Valtteri" <valtteri.rantala@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@kernel.vger.org
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 740530c571d1..2a88158bd1f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1146,14 +1146,36 @@ static bool missed_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	return test_bit(ring->id, &dev_priv->gpu_error.missed_irq_rings);
>  }
>  
> +static u64 local_clock_us(unsigned *cpu)
> +{
> +	u64 t;
> +
> +	*cpu = get_cpu();
> +	t = local_clock() >> 10;
> +	put_cpu();
> +
> +	return t;
> +}
> +
> +static bool busywait_stop(u64 timeout, unsigned cpu)
> +{
> +	unsigned this_cpu;
> +
> +	if (time_after64(local_clock_us(&this_cpu), timeout))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return this_cpu != cpu;
> +}

Perhaps you want to ask the timekeeping people for the right
primitive? I guess you are not the only one needing this..
									Pavel
									
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/