Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:47:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:47:47 -0500 Received: from bernstein.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk ([193.60.86.52]:52870 "EHLO bernstein.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:47:46 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 12:58:11 +0000 (GMT) From: Alastair Stevens X-X-Sender: alastair@quaratino To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: VM / OOM troubles in 2.4.20-ck4 (-aa VM) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1280 Lines: 31 Hi Guys - I was surprised to discover that the very latest 2.4.20 kernels running the latest -ck patches still have major VM problems, even with the -aa VM. Our dual Athlon server with 512Mb RAM / 1.2Gb swap, and not particularly heavily loaded, lasted 81 days with 2.4.20-ck1 under RH8.0, and then succumbed with these errors: VM error: killing process wineserver _alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x1d2/0) This time, it only lasted _3 days_ with -ck4 before the same thing happened. I presume this is the OOM killer? Swap is indeed full, but I've no idea why, on a machine that's only running a couple of instances of a small Windoze app under WINE. Is there a problem here? Should I just give up and run 2.5? ;-) Cheers Alastair .-=-. __________________________________,' `. \ www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk Alastair Stevens, Systems Management Team \ 01223 330383 MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge UK `=....................... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/