Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755868AbbLDIiP (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2015 03:38:15 -0500 Received: from kvm5.telegraphics.com.au ([98.124.60.144]:32936 "EHLO kvm5.telegraphics.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755738AbbLDIiM (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2015 03:38:12 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 19:38:03 +1100 (AEDT) From: Finn Thain To: Julian Calaby cc: Ondrej Zary , Michael Schmitz , linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 76/71] ncr5380: Enable PDMA for DTC chips In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20151118083455.331768508@telegraphics.com.au> <1449183781-2163-1-git-send-email-linux@rainbow-software.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1641 Lines: 47 On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, Julian Calaby wrote: > > - if (overrides[current_override].board == BOARD_NCR53C400A) { > > + if (overrides[current_override].board == BOARD_NCR53C400A || > > + overrides[current_override].board == BOARD_DTC3181E) { > > These if statements are starting to get a bit long, would it make > sense to replace them with a flag or equivalent? To what end? Shorter lines? As in, if (board_is_ncr53c400a || board_is_dtc3181e) { /* ... */ } I suppose that could be an improvement if new flags would entirely replace the override.board struct member and the existing switch statement, switch (overrides[current_override].board) { /* ... */ } Or maybe you meant testing a new flag something like this, if (hostdata->ncr53c400_compatible) { /* ... */ } If your concern is the Don't Repeat Yourself rule, I'm not sure that new flag would get tested more than once (?) And it would still have to be assigned using an "objectionably" long expression, e.g. hostdata->ncr53c400_compatible = overrides[current_override].board == BOARD_NCR53C400 || overrides[current_override].board == BOARD_NCR53C400A || overrides[current_override].board == BOARD_DTC3181E; Rather than add new flags, perhaps a 'switch' statement instead of an 'if' statement would be shorter (if the size of the expression is the problem). -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/