Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752572AbbLDLJE (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2015 06:09:04 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50896 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751817AbbLDLJC (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2015 06:09:02 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 12:08:56 +0100 From: Igor Mammedov To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, akataria@vmware.com, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, revers@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: enable SWIOTLB if system has SRAT memory regions above MAX_DMA32_PFN Message-ID: <20151204120856.5cbd06c8@nial.brq.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20151204082049.GA27096@gmail.com> References: <1448904938-92922-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <20151204082049.GA27096@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4913 Lines: 145 On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:20:50 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h > > index 94c18eb..53d7951 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h > > @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ static inline void disable_acpi(void) { } > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA > > extern int acpi_numa; > > extern int x86_acpi_numa_init(void); > > +unsigned long acpi_get_max_possible_pfn(void); > > #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */ > > > > #define acpi_unlazy_tlb(x) leave_mm(x) > > @@ -170,4 +171,8 @@ static inline pgprot_t arch_apei_get_mem_attribute(phys_addr_t addr) > > } > > #endif > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY > > +extern bool acpi_no_memhotplug; > > +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY */ > > + > > #endif /* _ASM_X86_ACPI_H */ > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c > > index adf0392..61d5ba5 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c > > @@ -88,7 +88,11 @@ int __init pci_swiotlb_detect_4gb(void) > > { > > /* don't initialize swiotlb if iommu=off (no_iommu=1) */ > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA > > + if (!no_iommu && acpi_get_max_possible_pfn() > MAX_DMA32_PFN) > > +#else > > if (!no_iommu && max_pfn > MAX_DMA32_PFN) > > +#endif > > swiotlb = 1; > > #endif > > return swiotlb; > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat.c > > index c2aea63..21b33f0 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/mm/srat.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat.c > > @@ -153,10 +153,20 @@ acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_cpu_affinity *pa) > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG > > static inline int save_add_info(void) {return 1;} > > +static unsigned long max_possible_pfn __initdata; > > #else > > static inline int save_add_info(void) {return 0;} > > #endif > > > > +unsigned long __init acpi_get_max_possible_pfn(void) > > +{ > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY > > + if (!acpi_no_memhotplug) > > + return max_possible_pfn; > > +#endif > > + return max_pfn; > > +} > > + > > /* Callback for parsing of the Proximity Domain <-> Memory Area mappings */ > > int __init > > acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma) > > @@ -203,6 +213,11 @@ acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma) > > pr_warn("SRAT: Failed to mark hotplug range [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx] in memblock\n", > > (unsigned long long)start, (unsigned long long)end - 1); > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG > > + if (max_possible_pfn < PFN_UP(end - 1)) > > + max_possible_pfn = PFN_UP(end - 1); > > +#endif > > + > > return 0; > > out_err_bad_srat: > > bad_srat(); > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c > > index 6b0d3ef..ae38f57 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c > > @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static void acpi_memory_device_remove(struct acpi_device *device) > > acpi_memory_device_free(mem_device); > > } > > > > -static bool __initdata acpi_no_memhotplug; > > +bool __initdata acpi_no_memhotplug; > > > > void __init acpi_memory_hotplug_init(void) > > { > > So I don't disagree with the fix in principle, but the implementation here is > rather ugly - it spreads new non-obvious #ifdefs across various critical parts of > the kernel. > > For example this: > > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA > > + if (!no_iommu && acpi_get_max_possible_pfn() > MAX_DMA32_PFN) > > +#else > > if (!no_iommu && max_pfn > MAX_DMA32_PFN) > > +#endif > > swiotlb = 1; > > #endif > > could be cleaned up by introducing a proper max_possible_pfn variable, and setting > it from the ACPI code - instead of exporting acpi_get_max_possible_pfn(). Thanks for review, I'll try to drop #ifdefs as suggested and split it in several patches. > > Another pattern is: > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY > > + if (!acpi_no_memhotplug) on the second thought, we don't need need this knob to force disabling SWIOTLB initialization since there is an existing "no_iommu" option to do it, so I'll drop this check. > > + return max_possible_pfn; > > +#endif > > this should be driven from the acpi_no_memhotplug knob, instead of spreading > acpi_no_memhotplug uses to other callsites. > > Furthermore, please split these various steps up into multiple steps (and first do > the preparatory changes, then fix the bug in the end) - to make it easier to > bisect and analyze if we regress existing functionality somewhere. > > Thanks, > > Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/