Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756163AbbLDUqc (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2015 15:46:32 -0500 Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com ([207.82.80.143]:21694 "EHLO eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753923AbbLDUqa convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2015 15:46:30 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] PCI/ACPI: Add ACPI support for non ECAM Host Bridge Controllers To: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <1449155999-220955-1-git-send-email-gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com> <1449155999-220955-2-git-send-email-gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com> <20151203175826.GB2935@red-moon> <5018756.5lEEeJVMod@wuerfel> Cc: liguozhu@hisilicon.com, Lorenzo Pieralisi , Gabriele Paoloni , linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, wangzhou1@hisilicon.com, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, liudongdong3@huawei.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, wangyijing@huawei.com, tn@semihalf.com, tglx@linutronix.de, xuwei5@hisilicon.com, bhelgaas@google.com, jiang.liu@linux.intel.com From: Jeremy Linton Message-ID: <5661FB9B.20201@arm.com> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 14:46:19 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5018756.5lEEeJVMod@wuerfel> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Dec 2015 20:46:26.0814 (UTC) FILETIME=[D85971E0:01D12ED4] X-MC-Unique: 4lpXZx8FSEq65bS0Lnj_xQ-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 950 Lines: 22 On 12/03/2015 02:58 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 03 December 2015 17:58:26 Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: >> I will put together a proposal to define the way we specify HID and >> related DSD properties for PCI host controllers and send it to >> the ACPI working group for review. > > That also requires a change to SBSA, right? Today, SBSA assumes that > we have a standard PCI host that will work with any hardware independent > PCI implementation in an OS. We either have to give up on SBSA saying > much about how PCI hosts are implemented, or stop assuming that hardware > is SBSA compliant. Which would be standardizing nonstandard hardware. It would surprise me if that got much traction. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/