Subject: Kernel bloat 2.4 vs. 2.5
From: Daniel Egger <degger@fhm.edu>
To: Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-PK67Ftr3WF/sfP7a+ejm"
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1046817738.4754.33.camel@sonja>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: 04 Mar 2003 23:42:18 +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1604
Lines: 50


--=-PK67Ftr3WF/sfP7a+ejm
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hija,

I've seen surprisingly few messages about the dramatic size increase
between a simple 2.4 and a 2.5 kernel image.=20

I just decided to check back with the 2.5 series again after my last try
with 2.5.53 (which wouldn't even boot) but had to dramatically cut down
the kernel featurewise to keep it below 1MB because I can't boot it over
tftp otherwise.=20

909824 Feb 14 20:02 vmlinuz-192.168.11.3-2.4.20
954880 Mar  4 17:01 vmlinuz-192.168.11.3-2.5.63

What you see here is a 2.4 kernel with almost everything needed to run
the machine built in and a (rsync'ed) 2.5.63 kernel with everything but
the basic stuff + ipv4 + NIC + NFS (+ other necessary features not
builtable as modules) built as modules.

Are there any patches I've missed to get that down? A slight tad bigger
and I couldn't even work with recent kernels if modules actually
worked... :/

--=20
Servus,
       Daniel

--=-PK67Ftr3WF/sfP7a+ejm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+ZSvKchlzsq9KoIYRAqmJAKDTJ8ESI6vuVDYcWUClZtBzREEKwACgwTur
6jZqwKLHHVtttoH/yrufpgA=
=1JZn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-PK67Ftr3WF/sfP7a+ejm--

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/