Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 18:11:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 18:11:37 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:57256 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 18:11:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 15:18:04 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Mark Wong Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: 2.5.63-mm2 Message-Id: <20030304151804.259a6473.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <1046819184.12936.100.camel@ibm-b> References: <20030302180959.3c9c437a.akpm@digeo.com> <1046815078.12931.79.camel@ibm-b> <20030304140918.4092f09b.akpm@digeo.com> <1046819184.12936.100.camel@ibm-b> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Mar 2003 23:21:58.0975 (UTC) FILETIME=[DA98B4F0:01C2E2A4] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 853 Lines: 20 Mark Wong wrote: > > Reverting to Linus's 2.5.63 tree produces the same problem for me. I > had thought I tried it before, but it turns out I was running 2.5.62. > 2.5.62's aic7xxx_old is good for me. There are no significant differences in that driver between .62 and .63. So I am assuming that 2.5.62 works, 2.5.63 doesn't, and that you have not actually tried 2.5.62's aic7xxx_old in a 2.5.63 tree? If so, don't bother - it won't make any difference. Looks like someone broke something in scsi core which colaterally damaged aic7xxx_old. I suggest you feed it into bugme for now. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/