Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755415AbbLGJKP (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2015 04:10:15 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:61183 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755240AbbLGJKM (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2015 04:10:12 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,394,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="868170906" From: Jani Nikula To: Archit Taneja , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, daniel@ffwll.ch Cc: a.hajda@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, airlied@linux.ie, treding@nvidia.com, l.stach@pengutronix.de, robh@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/dsi: Try to match non-DT dsi devices In-Reply-To: <56654A86.1060602@codeaurora.org> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <201511302050.evPZc1zs%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <56651937.1080405@codeaurora.org> <87a8pmzly4.fsf@intel.com> <56654A86.1060602@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+101~gb57168b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 11:10:07 +0200 Message-ID: <877fkqzksw.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1732 Lines: 54 On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja wrote: > On 12/07/2015 02:15 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 11/30/2015 06:15 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: >>>> Hi Archit, >>>> >>>> [auto build test ERROR on: v4.4-rc3] >>>> [also build test ERROR on: next-20151127] >>>> >>>> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Archit-Taneja/drm-dsi-DSI-for-devices-with-different-control-bus/20151130-200725 >>>> config: x86_64-allyesdebian (attached as .config) >>>> reproduce: >>>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree >>>> make ARCH=x86_64 >>>> >>>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >>>> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c: In function 'of_mipi_dsi_device_add': >>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c:168:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_modalias_node' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >>>> if (of_modalias_node(node, info.type, sizeof(info.type)) < 0) { >>> >>> Any suggestions on how to fix this? Is it ok to make DRM_MIPI_DSI >>> depend on CONFIG_OF? >> >> Please don't. > > Just curious, how did x86 use DSI if the only way to create DSI devices > until now was via DT? Oh, you want the gory details... we use the DSI code as a library for abstraction and helpers, without actually creating or registering the devices. BR, Jani. > > Archit > >> >> BR, >> Jani. >> -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/