Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 06:18:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 06:18:09 -0500 Received: from mailgw3a.lmco.com ([192.35.35.7]:65028 "EHLO mailgw3a.lmco.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 06:18:08 -0500 Content-return: allowed Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 06:28:36 -0500 From: "Reed, Timothy A" Subject: High Mem Options To: "Linux Kernel ML (E-mail)" Message-id: <9EFD49E2FB59D411AABA0008C7E675C00DCDFE01@emss04m10.ems.lmco.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 591 Lines: 15 Hello all, Yet another quick question...is there any down side to using the 64GB option over the 4GB option if the machine only has 2GB of RAM onboard?? I would think this would be a performance issue? Does the kernel only use the translation table if it has to access any memory location over 4GB? TIA Tim Reed Email: timothy.a.reed@lmco.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/