Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 14:00:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 14:00:31 -0500 Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com ([192.108.102.143]:39079 "EHLO smtp-send.myrealbox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 13:59:57 -0500 Message-ID: <3E664BB8.6010905@myrealbox.com> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 11:10:48 -0800 From: walt Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.21-pre5-ac1: Broadcom gigabit ethernet quirk introduced References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1098 Lines: 30 Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 09:37:09AM -0800, walt wrote: > >>Hi Alan, >> >>I have an ASUS A7VX8 motherboard with built-in Broadcom gigabit >>ethernet chip which has been working perfectly right up through >>-pre4-ac7 and now has developed a strange problem starting with >>-pre5-ac1. > > > Is this difference present in plain-jane 2.4.21-pre4 versus 2.4.21-pre5? Hi Jeff, I compiled a plain -pre5 just for you ;-) Yes, the difference apparently has nothing to do with Alan. And (as another data point) I tried 2.5.64 and I find exactly the same problem with the Broadcom chip: if I do the ifconfig down/up cycle the chip starts working normally again. I haven't played with 2.5.x very much so I can't tell you when the Broadcom problem started there. If you have a theory to test, I could compile an older 2.5 if you like. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/