Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754252AbbLIWxx (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2015 17:53:53 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:33908 "EHLO mail-wm0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753948AbbLIWxv (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2015 17:53:51 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151210092025.7c356624@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20151209121916.1d4cdba4@canb.auug.org.au> <20151210092025.7c356624@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 23:53:49 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_Gr=C3=BCnbacher?= To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Mike Marshall , Al Viro , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Andreas Gruenbacher Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 784 Lines: 18 2015-12-09 23:20 GMT+01:00 Stephen Rothwell : > OK, I wrote all that and then I realised that the preferred names > (XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_..) have been in Linus' tree for a long time (in > include/uapi/linux/xattr.h), so you could just change the orangefs tree > to use those already. i.e. my patch should apply cleanly to the > orangefs tree and build and work correctly independently of the vfs > tree change (I think). Yes, I think that would be best. Thanks, in particular for all the linux-next work! Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/