Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752733AbbLJOO7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:14:59 -0500 Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com ([146.101.78.143]:42862 "EHLO eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752505AbbLJOO5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:14:57 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/8] arm: parse cpu capacity from DT To: Juri Lelli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1448288921-30307-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com> <1448288921-30307-4-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, sudeep.holla@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com From: Dietmar Eggemann Message-ID: <566988DD.9080005@arm.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:14:53 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1448288921-30307-4-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Dec 2015 14:14:53.0568 (UTC) FILETIME=[23C31800:01D13355] X-MC-Unique: af18nd23QoW4tuZp7MSNSA-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3693 Lines: 111 On 23/11/15 14:28, Juri Lelli wrote: > With the introduction of cpu capacity bindings, CPU capacities can now be > extracted from DT. Add parsing of such information at boot time. We keep > code that can produce same information, based on different DT properties > and hard-coded values, as fall-back for backward compatibility. This patch-set should define _one_ way to be able to specify heterogeneous cpu capacity values for all arm and arm64 systems. So I would really like that we can agree on this solution ('capacity' property) and delete the old (cortex-a[15,7] only) solution based on struct cpu_efficiency table_efficiency[] and 'clock-frequency' property in arch/arm/kernel/topology.c. The appropriate code in arch/arm[,64]/kernel/topology.c should be the same. Everything else is highly confusing. > > Cc: Russell King > Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli > --- > arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c > index ec279d1..ecbff03 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c > @@ -78,6 +78,35 @@ static unsigned long *__cpu_capacity; > #define cpu_capacity(cpu) __cpu_capacity[cpu] > > static unsigned long middle_capacity = 1; > +static bool capacity_from_dt = true; > +static u32 capacity_scale = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE; > + > +static int __init parse_cpu_capacity(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu) > +{ > + int ret = 1; > + u32 cpu_capacity; > + > + ret = of_property_read_u32(cpu_node, > + "capacity", > + &cpu_capacity); > + if (!ret) { > + u64 capacity; > + > + /* > + * Enforce capacity <= capacity-scale. > + */ > + cpu_capacity = cpu_capacity <= capacity_scale ? cpu_capacity : > + capacity_scale; > + capacity = (cpu_capacity << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT) / > + capacity_scale; > + > + set_capacity_scale(cpu, capacity); > + pr_info("CPU%d: DT cpu capacity %lu\n", > + cpu, arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu)); > + } > + > + return !ret; > +} > > /* > * Iterate all CPUs' descriptor in DT and compute the efficiency > @@ -99,6 +128,18 @@ static void __init parse_dt_topology(void) > __cpu_capacity = kcalloc(nr_cpu_ids, sizeof(*__cpu_capacity), > GFP_NOWAIT); > > + cn = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus"); > + if (!cn) { > + pr_err("No CPU information found in DT\n"); > + return; > + } > + > + if (!of_property_read_u32(cn, "capacity-scale", &capacity_scale)) > + pr_info("DT cpus capacity-scale %u\n", capacity_scale); > + else > + pr_debug("DT cpus capacity-scale not found: assuming %u\n", > + capacity_scale); > + > for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { > const u32 *rate; > int len; > @@ -110,6 +151,13 @@ static void __init parse_dt_topology(void) > continue; > } > > + if (parse_cpu_capacity(cn, cpu)) { > + of_node_put(cn); > + continue; > + } > + > + capacity_from_dt = false; > + > for (cpu_eff = table_efficiency; cpu_eff->compatible; cpu_eff++) > if (of_device_is_compatible(cn, cpu_eff->compatible)) > break; > @@ -160,7 +208,7 @@ static void __init parse_dt_topology(void) > */ > static void update_cpu_capacity(unsigned int cpu) > { > - if (!cpu_capacity(cpu)) > + if (!cpu_capacity(cpu) || capacity_from_dt) > return; > > set_capacity_scale(cpu, cpu_capacity(cpu) / middle_capacity); > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/