Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754268AbbLJPbe (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:31:34 -0500 Received: from axentia.se ([87.96.186.132]:7345 "EHLO EMAIL.axentia.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751071AbbLJPbd convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:31:33 -0500 From: Peter Rosin To: Russell King - ARM Linux CC: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org'" , "nico@fluxnic.net" , Will Deacon Subject: RE: Domain faults when CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN is enabled Thread-Topic: Domain faults when CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN is enabled Thread-Index: AdEtnmv+793Els3qRoSjRBiCkZdNQQABlROQAAMt1YAAA3GJ4P//8rWA///rC2CAADKAgP//w/WAgABvaQCAAAzOAP//qiMgAUb6eoD//wkDcA== Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:29:37 +0000 Message-ID: <7e60a8ccde1940d68ec4780abe154cbd@EMAIL.axentia.se> References: <1267b061b66c4d1fa8af1955825bc97a@EMAIL.axentia.se> <20151203110041.GK8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20151203115143.GM8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <533b0f1f264e42e78b94bbff9570fb50@EMAIL.axentia.se> <20151203133727.GN8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <94580382ca344ae2b64f66fb778c6ff7@EMAIL.axentia.se> <20151203164118.GR8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20151203172708.GT8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <45b615420548463ebd1d582bc5da2eff@EMAIL.axentia.se> <20151210002213.GL8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20151210002213.GL8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Accept-Language: en-US, sv-SE Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [217.210.101.82] x-gfi-smtp-submission: 1 x-gfi-smtp-hellodomain: EMAIL.axentia.se x-gfi-smtp-remoteip: 192.168.2.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1089 Lines: 29 Russell King wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:37:51PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote: > > I took both patches for a quick spin (a dozen boots and one hour uptime > > after that for each patch) and no incidents. I have not gathered data, > > but the crash on boot feels like it's quite a bit above 50% when there > > is a problem so this feels good (I used 5 clean reboots when I bisected > > and that worked). > > > > Reported-by: Peter Rosin > > Tested-by: Peter Rosin > > > > (and please don't forget to cc stable) > > I've decided to do a more in-depth fix, so that we also solve the issue > that when we schedule in these down_read()s, we don't leak the permissive > domain register setting into the switched-to context. > > Can you test this patch please? Thanks. Still looking good. Cheers, Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/