Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:46:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:46:59 -0500 Received: from meryl.it.uu.se ([130.238.12.42]:36275 "EHLO meryl.it.uu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:46:58 -0500 From: Mikael Pettersson MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15975.17847.535048.258612@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:57:27 +0100 To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: x86-64 fixes for 2.4.21-pre5 In-Reply-To: References: <15974.15180.311304.526712@gargle.gargle.HOWL.suse.lists.linux.kernel> X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under Emacs 20.7.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1015 Lines: 24 Andi Kleen writes: > Mikael Pettersson writes: > > > This fixes a linkage error caused by the IDE layer's use of the > > new ndelay() macro. I simply cloned the i386 implementation. > > > > This also silences two assembler warnings in bootsect.S and setup.S. > > Those warnings are caused by a change in binutils' behaviour a LONG > > time ago. This can't be fixed for i386 in the official stable kernel > > since it breaks old tool chains, but that's not an issue for x86-64. > > I fixed it some time ago in my tree, but Marcelo dropped the fixes, > sorry. Would that be your personal x86-64 tree? I had a look at x86-64.org's browsable CVS before I posted my patch, but none of the things my patch fixed were fixed there. /Mikael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/