Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752073AbbLJU5W (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:57:22 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:43370 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751047AbbLJU5U (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:57:20 -0500 Message-ID: <5669E72C.4090701@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:57:16 -0500 From: Philip Elcan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Hunter , Ulf Hansson , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Timur Tabi , Jon Masters , Mark Langsdorf , harba@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-acpi: set non-removable in ACPI table References: <1449150480-1173-1-git-send-email-pelcan@codeaurora.org> <56604E57.9000201@intel.com> <5661B3F0.2010000@codeaurora.org> <5665438B.10104@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <5665438B.10104@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1803 Lines: 50 On 12/07/2015 03:30 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 04/12/15 17:40, Philip Elcan wrote: >> On 12/03/2015 09:14 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote: >>> On 03/12/15 15:48, Philip Elcan wrote: >>>> This allows setting an SDHC controller as non-removable >>>> by using the _RMV method in the ACPI table. It doesn't >>> Is that _RMV on the host controller? Shouldn't it be on the card i.e. child >>> device node? >> Yes, this is on the host controller. The ACPI table only describes the >> host controller, not the child nodes. >> > If you look at Intel devices, the _RMV is on the child e.g. > > Device (SDHA) > { > Name (_HID, "80860F14") // _HID: Hardware ID > Name (_CID, "PNP0D40") // _CID: Compatible ID > Name (_DDN, "Intel(R) eMMC Controller - 80860F14") // _DDN: DOS Device Name > ... > Device (EMMD) > { > ... > Method (_RMV, 0, NotSerialized) // _RMV: Removal Status > { > Return (Zero) > } > } > } > > I am not an ACPI expert but that seems like the correct place for it. My understanding is that in ACPI you don't generally create child devices on buses that are discoverable. > >>>> mark it as non-removable if GPIO card detection is >>>> already setup. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Philip Elcan >>>> --- >>>> -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/