Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:05:02 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org, cov@codeaurora.org,
        jcm@redhat.com, agross@codeaurora.org, arnd@arndb.de,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 3/3] dma: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA channel
 driver
Message-ID: <20151211093502.GY1854@localhost>
References: <1448245707-27499-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
 <1448245707-27499-4-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
 <20151130085948.GC3901@localhost>
 <565CAC4C.7080909@codeaurora.org>
 <20151201113458.GL3901@localhost>
 <565E0E1D.1040505@codeaurora.org>
 <565F40A5.2040701@codeaurora.org>
 <20151205080030.GJ1854@localhost>
 <5669DC48.2040402@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5669DC48.2040402@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1584
Lines: 41

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 03:10:48PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 12/5/2015 3:00 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 02:04:05PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> >>>>> You are missing the point. Channel can be paused, yes but the descriptor
> >>>>> is in queue and is not paused. The descriptor running is paused, yes.
> >>>>> There is subtle difference between these
> >>> I'll follow your recommendation. PAUSE for the currently active
> >>> descriptor and DMA_IN_PROGRESS for the rest.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I'm now confused.
> >>
> >> I looked at several DMA driver implementations.
> >>
> >> 1. They call dma_cookie_status function to see if the job is done.
> >> 2. If done, they return right ahead.
> >> 3. Otherwise, dma_cookie_status returns DMA_IN_PROGRESS.
> >> 4. Next the code checks if the channel is paused and return value is
> >> DMA_IN_PROGRESS. The code changes return code to DMA_PAUSED.
> >>
> >> Whereas, I was returning paused first before even checking if the
> >> descriptor is done. Are you OK with the sequence 1..4 above?
> > 
> > Yes am okay with this with slight change in 4.
> > 
> > You should set to PAUSED only for current descriptor and not for the ones in
> > queue
> > 
> 
> OK. I'll post a new version with this. Is there any other comment that
> needed to be addressed?

Looks okay to me

-- 
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/