Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S268125AbTCFRBp>; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:01:45 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S268130AbTCFRBp>; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:01:45 -0500
Received: from 205-158-62-158.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.158]:26017 "HELO
	spf1.us.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S268125AbTCFRBo>; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:01:44 -0500
Message-ID: <20030306142252.22630.qmail@linuxmail.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404)
From: "Felipe Alfaro Solana" <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
To: degger@fhm.edu, akpm@digeo.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 15:22:52 +0100
Subject: Re: Kernel bloat 2.4 vs. 2.5
X-Originating-Ip: 213.4.13.153
X-Originating-Server: ws5-7.us4.outblaze.com
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 910
Lines: 28

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Daniel Egger <degger@fhm.edu> 
Date: 	06 Mar 2003 04:25:15 +0100 
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com> 
Subject: Re: Kernel bloat 2.4 vs. 2.5 
 
> Am Mit, 2003-03-05 um 00.41 schrieb Andrew Morton: 
 
> As I said, the 2.4 kernel has almost everything built in while 2.5 was 
> stripped down to minimum size possible. The latter is still unusable 
> since modules do not work. :/ 
 
??? I'm using 2.5 and modules do work perfectly... Did you 
get Rusty's latest modutils? 
 
   Felipe 
 
-- 
______________________________________________
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/