Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:34:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:34:26 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:16807 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:34:24 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3 From: Alan Cox To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Linus Torvalds , Jeff Garzik , Andrew Morton , rml@tech9.net, Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1046976597.17715.93.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 06 Mar 2003 18:49:57 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 960 Lines: 21 On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 17:11, Ingo Molnar wrote: > X is special. Especially in Andrew's wild-window-dragging experiment X is > a pure CPU-bound task that just eats CPU cycles no end. There _only_ thing > that makes it special is that there's a human looking at the output of the > X client. This is information that is simply not available to the kernel. Just like a streaming video server Just like a 3D game using DRI X isnt special at all. Research OS people have done stuff like time transfers but I've not seen that in a production OS. In that situation an interactive task blocking on a server hands on some of its interactiveness to whoever services the request. Thats not a trivial Linux addition however - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/