Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754156AbbLKOS7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:18:59 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:23986 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752309AbbLKOS6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:18:58 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:18:45 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Sanidhya Solanki Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, lidza.louina@gmail.com, driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: dgnc: Patch includes the checkpatch fixes Message-ID: <20151211141845.GK5284@mwanda> References: <20151211032149.489d90d1@gmail.com> <20151211130233.GJ5284@mwanda> <20151211051043.4f7d24df@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151211051043.4f7d24df@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1706 Lines: 46 On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 05:10:43AM -0500, Sanidhya Solanki wrote: > On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 16:02:33 +0300 > Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Sanidhya Solanki > > > @@ -110,7 +98,16 @@ static ssize_t dgnc_vpd_show(struct device *p, struct device_attribute *attr, > > > int count = 0; > > > int i = 0; > > > > > > - DGNC_VERIFY_BOARD(p, bd); > > > + do { > > > + if (!p) > > > + return 0; > > > + > > > + bd = dev_get_drvdata(p); > > > + if (!bd || bd->magic != DGNC_BOARD_MAGIC) > > > + return 0; > > > + if (bd->state != BOARD_READY) > > > + return 0; > > > + } while (0); > > > > Google about why do while(0) loops are used in macros and then redo > > this. Mostly the patch isn't bad, but I suspect I'm going to complain > > about how you split up some of the long lines. > > Let me just be completely sure that you and I are on the same page > here. The macro was used to replace the do-while loop, I replaced all > instances of the macro with the the actual loop. Both pieces were > originally part of the code, just using macros in place of do-while > statements. Do you still want me to change it? Maybe the original > author did it for a specific reason. > https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-purpose-of-using-do-while-0-in-macros Do while(0) is used to make a macro look like a function. Since we have deleted the macro we don't need the do while. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/