Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:00:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:00:50 -0500 Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk ([130.88.200.93]:51985 "EHLO serenity.mcc.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:00:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:11:20 +0000 From: John Levon To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Robert Love , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3 Message-ID: <20030306181120.GA31439@compsoc.man.ac.uk> References: <20030306175533.GA29400@compsoc.man.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-Url: http://www.movementarian.org/ X-Record: Mr. Scruff - Trouser Jazz X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *18qzpx-0007vf-00*uDq4wjvu31A* Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 834 Lines: 21 On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:07:17AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > But it was definitely there. 3-5 second _pauses_. Not slowdowns. > > > > It's still there. Red Hat 8.0, 2.5.63. The thing can pause for 15+ > > Oh, well. I didn't actually even verify that UNIX domain sockets will > cause synchronous wakeups, so the patch may literally be doing nothing at > all. You can try that theory out by just removing the test for > "in_interrupt()". Sorry, I think I misunderstood what you meant in your comment above. I haven't actually tried these patches yet, worry not. regards, john - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/